branham1965 wrote:I NEVER CALLED REVEREND DAKE A HERETIC.
I KNOW ONE PERSON WHO WOULD NOT AGREE WITH YOU .....REVEREND ERNEST WINSTON ANGLEY.
bibleman wrote:Hi Billy,branham1965 wrote:i thought as much.
do you notice when reggie asked for information on another thread i told him where to go in the DARB.i would do the same in any other venue.i never in my life tried to hiss be a snake and lead others to any position i hold.not on Brother Branham or anything.or cause any division.
i will never be a blue ribbon anything anywhere.im not worthy of that.ive ruined that.ive lost everything.and its not coming back.im 86'd for life.ive been banned from many north end bars here....in days past.and its not for just talking.
im sure that offends some. it grieves me as well.
I read all of your post as do others. Your input is valuable. You just really need to discvoer how much God loves you and then order your life according to HIS Word and will for you. We all pray for you.
Now that being said, in the past you have voiced your opposition to Dake on many doctrines. Faith, Healing, Prosperity, etc. And that is fine, no one here has to agree with Dake on everything. But to be one that is recognized as supporting this Board as a VIP member, and it's name sake, Finis Dake, then of course they would need to be in agreement with his teachings on most teachings and be a long standing member. They certainly can't be someone that calls Dake a heretic. I know you would agree.
Billy,
You said Dake was teaching HERESY when he taught that the old man with the sin nature was destroyed at the New Birth!
branham1965 wrote:
put off the old man...put on the new man.
if you live after the flesh you shall...die.
now you PERFECT folks tell people the sin nature is gone upon regeneration.
PAUL NEVER SHARED YOUR HERESY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
every person of that view fell openly.its a load of rubbish.always have been.
if you have no flesh why are you struggling so.could you hang out alone with a few Vicky secrets models???
there is nothing that sickens me more.
http://www.dakebibleboard.com/viewtopic ... 565#p74565