Go back and read what you said. You said my life was sad. I said it was only sad if you didn't understand God's love for those that call Him ABBA father.bibleman wrote:Ed,Justaned wrote:I didn't personally attack you I only said that if your attack of me was true then you didn't understand about God.bibleman wrote:Justaned wrote:I said if you view my life as sad and my view of God as a poor apraisal of God and His Righteousness then you have no understanding of God or of His love for those that call HIm Abba father.bibleman wrote:Hi Ed,Justaned wrote:bibleman wrote:
Hi Ed,
The problem you face is you have a clue if God will keep His Word or not - according to what yu have said. For me that is a very sad life and a very POOR appraisal of God and His RIGHTEOUSNESS!
Actually I do have a clue whether God will keep His Word or not. I know He will because He wants to. You want to act as if there is some kind of cosmic judicial system that requires God to do things. And there is none.
If you view my life as sad and my view of God as a poor appraisal of God and His righteousness then you have no understanding of God or of HIs love for those that call Him ABBA father.
Above you said: "you have no understanding of God or of HIs love for those that call Him ABBA father."
In this statement you have attacked my mental intellect by saying that I have NO understanding.
Do you think you owe me an apology?"Marx and Engels never tried to refute their opponents with argument. They insulted, ridiculed, derided, slandered, and traduced them, and in the use of these methods their followers are not less expert. Their polemic is directed never against the argument of the opponent, but always against his person."
Now you saying I owe you an apology for attacking your mental intellect. So then I must coclude you are saying you don't have any understanding of God nor do you understand God's love for those that call HIm ABBA father.
Since that is your confession I would say you have bigger problems than some guy like me attacking your intellect.
Perhaps if you want to confess that in your opinion that there is no God, then you could confirm your intellect deficit.
OK NO apology!
Then you should never ask others to NOT attack you personally as you have attacked me!
So for my attack to come to fruition would require 2 things. First you would have to admit you first attacked my by saying I had a sad life. And second you will have to admit you really didn't understand God's love for those that call HIm Abba Father.
So no I don't owe you apology and unless you first apologize to me for calling my life sad. And second you have to admit that you don't understand God's love.
Admit those two things and you will be right I did attack you in defense of your attack on me.
Who were your talking about when you said I didn't understand?
Me - that is personal to ME!
But I guess you have one rule for how others treat yo and one rule for how you treat others - me!
Therefore for my attack to be a valid attack. Two conditions would have to occur. First that you attacked me first by saying I had a sad life. And the second condition you would have to admit you didn't understand God's love for those that call him Abba Father. Then my statement would be correct you have no understanding.
So the ball is in your court. Did you or did you not first attack me saying my life was sad?
Second for my statement to be true you would have to admit you don't understand God's love. Then it would be true to say I said you have no understanding.
See a conditional statement is real hard to twist to make it appear you are the offended party.
