In the first Fathfisher is snidely criticizing me for referencing another author and in the second he is quoting another author.
fatherfisher wrote:you might want to consult the B-I-B-L-E even more than John Feinberg
Why is when I use quote an external source to establish a better understanding of a position or doctrine I'm told I need to get back to the Bible, but when someone does the exact same thing it is perfectly acceptable? Why is that?fatherfisher wrote:The truth is as Dake explains "men in previous dispensations had to look forward to it [the death of Christ on the cross] by faith, in order to receive the benefits of the cross.