Dake Bible Discussion BoardFinis Dake on Positive Confession

General Discussion Forum devoted to the study of God's Word in Honor of Finis J. Dake.
Post Reply
User avatar
branham1965
Little Children, Let No Man Deceive You: He that Doeth Righteousness is Righteous, Even as He is Righteous
Posts: 2428
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by branham1965 »

:arrow: those are wonderful Reverend.thanks for sharing.
thats Songs of Solomon true love.
i praise the Lord for that.
that is a testimony to the world and the church.
bibleman wrote:
branham1965 wrote:Pastor Bible,

i have often wondered.... +ummm
are you and Sister Bible

Clemson Tigers or South Carolina Gamecocks???

Ohio State plays Clemson in the Orange bowl i think it is.
You know, not against football, but we don't watch much football. But our church is about half and half Clemson and Carolina!

All we do is ministry and Bible studies. Sheila helped me on the Dake bio as well as the Tithe and Offering Books. We pastor together. We spend all of our time together and do everything together. I go with her to the grocery store and she goes with me to the barber shop!

Image

See Elvis together:

Image

Ride our car together:

Image

This is the tag:

Image

Play golf together:

Image

Go to movies together:

Image

Go to snake churches together:

Image

Eat ice cream together:

Image

Ride "Tilt-A-Whirl" rides together at the fair:

Image

Hold hands at the movies:

Image

Sit our take home drinks together after a date:

Image


User avatar
branham1965
Little Children, Let No Man Deceive You: He that Doeth Righteousness is Righteous, Even as He is Righteous
Posts: 2428
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by branham1965 »

let the beauty of Jesus be seen in me all His wonderful power and purity...
Fanny Crosby wrote.

You and Sister Sheila have the glow of Jesus.

Dad Hagin spoke of this.you guys have it. +manger


User avatar
branham1965
Little Children, Let No Man Deceive You: He that Doeth Righteousness is Righteous, Even as He is Righteous
Posts: 2428
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by branham1965 »

i feel like we dont catch up like we once did.you are a very old friend on here 7 years.
i think about you.and appreciate you.i was a buzzard to get on you. :agrue: im very sorry.

some have misunderstood me on here.they think meekness or kindness is being a weak female dog.
thats NOT the case.

quote="scottae316"]
branham1965 wrote:you are one i NEVER thought would take off Scott. :lol:


Billy, I am afraid I do not understand what you mean?


User avatar
scottae316
Wrestle Against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:21 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by scottae316 »

bibleman wrote:
scottae316 wrote: Leon,
If you do not know[if I was WOF], why did you say that I am not WOF? Is that appropriate or right?
OK,

I though you were NOT WOF because of your opposition to so many issues here on the Dake Board. Most WOF people usually line up pretty well with the Dake subjects under discussion here.

Is that appropriate or right? Hum,.. I guess so, don't really know if a thought can be deemed wrong concerning an impression in this regard. Is it a big deal?

Anyway your two questions are answered! :mrgreen:
OK,

What issues have a opposed here, I am guessing theological issues ones. I don't remember any that I have said I disagree on, please refresh my memory with some examples.

To answer you, it is not a big deal, but you made a judgement about me and it was wrong. You did not say I think or it looks like, you said clearly I was not WOF, that is more than a thought or impression.

As to most WOF people lining up with Dake, I would say there is more agreement than disagreement, but there are areas where there is disagreement, eschatology details would be one area.


User avatar
scottae316
Wrestle Against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:21 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by scottae316 »

branham1965 wrote:i feel like we dont catch up like we once did.you are a very old friend on here 7 years.
i think about you.and appreciate you.i was a buzzard to get on you. :agrue: im very sorry.

some have misunderstood me on here.they think meekness or kindness is being a weak female dog.
thats NOT the case.

quote="scottae316"]
branham1965 wrote:you are one i NEVER thought would take off Scott. :lol:


Billy, I am afraid I do not understand what you mean?
Billy,

I don't spend near as much time here as I once did, sorry I do miss chatting with you also. I have always considered you a friend, and I took no offense, just did not understand what you were saying.


User avatar
bibleman
Administrator
Posts: 1846
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 1998 5:23 pm
Location: South Carolina
Contact:

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by bibleman »

scottae316 wrote:
bibleman wrote:
scottae316 wrote: Leon,
If you do not know[if I was WOF], why did you say that I am not WOF? Is that appropriate or right?
OK,

I though you were NOT WOF because of your opposition to so many issues here on the Dake Board. Most WOF people usually line up pretty well with the Dake subjects under discussion here.

Is that appropriate or right? Hum,.. I guess so, don't really know if a thought can be deemed wrong concerning an impression in this regard. Is it a big deal?

Anyway your two questions are answered! :mrgreen:
OK,

What issues have a opposed here, I am guessing theological issues ones. I don't remember any that I have said I disagree on, please refresh my memory with some examples.

To answer you, it is not a big deal, but you made a judgement about me and it was wrong. You did not say I think or it looks like, you said clearly I was not WOF, that is more than a thought or impression.

As to most WOF people lining up with Dake, I would say there is more agreement than disagreement, but there are areas where there is disagreement, eschatology details would be one area.
Hey Scott,

How about as you seemed to have mentioned, the Millennium Kingdom being 1000 years.

Aren't you opposed to that?


God bless
Leon Bible

http://www.ministryhelps.com
http://www.dakebible.com
http://www.dakebibleboard.com
https://www.facebook.com/groups/DakeBibleDiscussion/

The fault in Bible complications is not with God or the Bible, but with men who refuse to believe what God says and think we have to interpret what He says in order to get the meaning. Dake Bible -Mark 11:17 note
User avatar
branham1965
Little Children, Let No Man Deceive You: He that Doeth Righteousness is Righteous, Even as He is Righteous
Posts: 2428
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by branham1965 »

im :o :o :o for posting that.i love to read your posts.and ive always felt you were very vital here.
Pax.
scottae316 wrote:
branham1965 wrote:i feel like we dont catch up like we once did.you are a very old friend on here 7 years.
i think about you.and appreciate you.i was a buzzard to get on you. :agrue: im very sorry.

some have misunderstood me on here.they think meekness or kindness is being a weak female dog.
thats NOT the case.

quote="scottae316"]
branham1965 wrote:you are one i NEVER thought would take off Scott. :lol:


Billy, I am afraid I do not understand what you mean?
Billy,

I don't spend near as much time here as I once did, sorry I do miss chatting with you also. I have always considered you a friend, and I took no offense, just did not understand what you were saying.


User avatar
scottae316
Wrestle Against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:21 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by scottae316 »

bibleman wrote:
scottae316 wrote:
bibleman wrote:
scottae316 wrote: Leon,
If you do not know[if I was WOF], why did you say that I am not WOF? Is that appropriate or right?
OK,

I though you were NOT WOF because of your opposition to so many issues here on the Dake Board. Most WOF people usually line up pretty well with the Dake subjects under discussion here.

Is that appropriate or right? Hum,.. I guess so, don't really know if a thought can be deemed wrong concerning an impression in this regard. Is it a big deal?

Anyway your two questions are answered! :mrgreen:
OK,

What issues have a opposed here, I am guessing theological issues ones. I don't remember any that I have said I disagree on, please refresh my memory with some examples.

To answer you, it is not a big deal, but you made a judgement about me and it was wrong. You did not say I think or it looks like, you said clearly I was not WOF, that is more than a thought or impression.

As to most WOF people lining up with Dake, I would say there is more agreement than disagreement, but there are areas where there is disagreement, eschatology details would be one area.
Hey Scott,

How about as you seemed to have mentioned, the Millennium Kingdom being 1000 years.

Aren't you opposed to that?
Hey Leon,

Please be accurate, what I said was that the word Millennium does not appear in English translations of Scripture, and I objected to you calling those who hold to other positions as idiots. I still maintain that calling people that is not Christian. Since when is this a basic tenet of WOF teaching?


User avatar
scottae316
Wrestle Against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:21 am

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by scottae316 »

Billy,

Thanks for this, but I am sure you are in the minority of thinking I am vital here. I have been told that many complain about my presence.

PAX
Scott
branham1965 wrote:im :o :o :o for posting that.i love to read your posts.and ive always felt you were very vital here.
Pax.
scottae316 wrote:
branham1965 wrote:i feel like we dont catch up like we once did.you are a very old friend on here 7 years.
i think about you.and appreciate you.i was a buzzard to get on you. :agrue: im very sorry.

some have misunderstood me on here.they think meekness or kindness is being a weak female dog.
thats NOT the case.

quote="scottae316"]
branham1965 wrote:you are one i NEVER thought would take off Scott. :lol:


Billy, I am afraid I do not understand what you mean?
Billy,

I don't spend near as much time here as I once did, sorry I do miss chatting with you also. I have always considered you a friend, and I took no offense, just did not understand what you were saying.


User avatar
Justaned
Little Children, Let No Man Deceive You: He that Doeth Righteousness is Righteous, Even as He is Righteous
Posts: 1938
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:19 pm

Re: Finis Dake on Positive Confession

Post by Justaned »

scottae316 wrote:Billy,

Thanks for this, but I am sure you are in the minority of thinking I am vital here. I have been told that many complain about my presence.

PAX
Scott
branham1965 wrote:im :o :o :o for posting that.i love to read your posts.and ive always felt you were very vital here.
Pax.
scottae316 wrote:
branham1965 wrote:i feel like we dont catch up like we once did.you are a very old friend on here 7 years.
i think about you.and appreciate you.i was a buzzard to get on you. :agrue: im very sorry.

some have misunderstood me on here.they think meekness or kindness is being a weak female dog.
thats NOT the case.

quote="scottae316"]
branham1965 wrote:you are one i NEVER thought would take off Scott. :lol:


Billy, I am afraid I do not understand what you mean?
Billy,

I don't spend near as much time here as I once did, sorry I do miss chatting with you also. I have always considered you a friend, and I took no offense, just did not understand what you were saying.

Let me add that I enjoy your comments. We have differed at times but we have also found common ground at times and that is what good discussion is all about. One thing you never did was launch a personal attack and that alone is worthy of recognition for someone on this forum. I respect you immensely for that.


Post Reply