I would aslo like to add that I think Ed has tendency to over spiritualize the literal meaning of the scriptures that are being conveyed about this. That is the first thing I noticed about the way he views scripture. A lot of Christian do this, I use to as well.bibleman wrote:Hi Ed,Justaned wrote:Rocky wrote:I understand, But a lot of what you said here is not what is shown in the bible, Unless you say it is a "figure of speech". This seems more of an opinion then what is actually show in scripture. That's what myself and others have tried to show you. Maybe study this in a DARB or GPFM to gain a better understanding of this. So again, I agree with the bible and Dake on this, Dake gives countless scriptures on this teaching and that cannot be denied unless again you say it is a "figure of speech" the bible never says its a figure of speech..Justaned wrote:Rocky wrote:Because it is an oxymoron so to speak. Hmm I have a free choice but it is already set in stone what I will do. Why not just askEd Wrote:
Again my question why does God knowing the choice man will make effect man's free will ability to make that choice?
Man's faith and obedience can still be seen in the choice.
You keep saying foreknowledge is not free will. And I'm asking why? If God does nothing to effect man's decision and man makes that decision of his own free will how did God knowing what decision man would make effect the process?
God what I will do and do that, and it really does not matter what I do because it is already known and set in stone what I will do any way, so why try why even ask God to move in any thing, I mean why even pray? Its already known and set in stone. lol. Ed you have not been through much have you? And, Because according to you it is already set in stone of what people will do, like it is already written, hence the choice has been made for us by foreknowledge, it is predestined in a sense. How is that a free choice if it is already set in stone what I will do?, that is almost predestination. Another thing I have noticed is that when you are shown plain scripture about God limiting himself in his foreknowledge in dealing with the free will in times of testing, you just say it is a "figure of speech", or you twist it or manipulate it somehow and say "yes, you gave scripture but thats not what it means" even though the subject matter is clear and concise. Its seems you have a tendency to over spiritualize the literal meaning of the scriptures that they are conveying about this. Ed The bible has shown God being surprised, sorry, and not knowing ahead of time of mans actions. Even physically going down and seeing things for him self, God even has angels to report to him. If you are right then you must rip those scripture out of the bible or say its an allegory or a "figure of speech." When this is pointed out to you, you say it was a figure of speech. This is a dangerous way to interpret the bible in my opinion because this is how false ideas get started. What else can we say is a figure of speech to twist the scriptures? I just find it easier to take the bible for what it says.
The thing you miss Rocky is your don't know what you will do until you are faced with the decision. That is when the rubber hits the road. You can say you will do this or that but until you have to make the decision you simply don't know.
Let us say God would simple tell you, you would not believe it. You would say, that's what you say but you don't know." If God gave you proof you would still deny the truthfulness of the proof. The only way you will ever know what you will do is after you have been confronted with the choice and made it.
This is where God shows His love for us he allows us to fall and is there to help us up. God is preparing us to take our place in heaven. It requires us to learn about ourselves and to make the decisions to either grow and get better or to simply enjoy life's pleasures and remain as babes.
God tested Abraham for Abraham's sake and for ours. Otherwise people would always question Abraham's faith. In fact some still do by saying Abraham knew God would stop him and etc.
If God wanted perfect people God could have just created them. What God wants is people that became people of God through their own choices.
Think about it how many tell kids they will be addicted if they take drugs. Every addiction unless it was done to them was done because they thought they could handle it, they were above addiction and there it no way they would let themselves get that low. They had to see for themselves.
The testing is for us God already knows the mettle we are made of.
Oh, and You said:
"The testing is for us God already knows the mettle we are made of"
If that were the case Why did not God tell Abraham, "now you know" instead of "now I know"?
Rocky
God clearly declares Himself all knowing. We call it omniscience. Now that is declared throughout scripture in many many places. So it is fact God is all knowing. He even knows your heart, when a sparrow falls to the ground and the number of hairs on your head. So the extent of His knowledge is not just the important things but all things.
Now if God know all things and then says he has come to see. Is God saying he didn't know and needed to come and see or is He explaining His presence before Abraham to demonstrate his mercy but didn't want to reveal that to Abraham?
Of course you will say it is because God didn't know but God has already declared he did know. If he knows man's heart he knew the status of every heart in Sodom. So your interpretation while a literal rendering of scripture does not make any sense. So we either have a conflict or we say no God was using a figure of speech. That is the only options.
Now if we want to invent theology and say God limits Himself sometimes we can explain it that way but nothing in scripture reveals God ever limiting himself. Jesus limited Himself to become a man but never God.
Again if God limited Himself for the citizens of Sodom then why not for everyone? Yet God says He sees the heart of man.
Do you see your interpretation produces conflict and contradiction. Mine make all scripture reconcile with all of scripture.
Above you said: "Do you see your interpretation produces conflict and contradiction. Mine make all scripture reconcile with all of scripture."
Proverbs 12:15 The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise.
Ed, Ed,, Ed,,, Rocky has spent a lot of time giving Scripture after Scripture - yet you have not heard his counsel. You instead think you are the only one that is right.
Think of it. According to you Rocky is wrong! VictoryWord is Wrong! I am wrong! Ironman is Wrong! Macca is wrong!
You have refused all of this wise counsel even to the point of saying God did NOT say what He said and eve God is wrong in your eyes!
Don't you think it is time that you give up your man-made ideas and LISTEN TO COUNSEL?
And Ed,
Here is some statements that you just made that proves my point about this brotherman.
And there is the difference Of how we approach scripture and this is why your understanding is clouded a lot of Christian have this issue.So your interpretation, while a literal rendering of scripture, does not make any sense
Ed the conflict is because you refuse to take scripture for what is says for whatever reason. It seems you always try to find some hidden meaning or sometimes even manipulate the meaning to fit what you want it to mean.Do you see your interpretation produces conflict and contradiction. Mine make all scripture reconcile with all of scripture
And Ed my brotha, this statement is very inaccurate
Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son from me.”Now if we want to invent theology and say God limits Himself sometimes we can explain it that way but nothing in scripture reveals God ever limiting himself. Jesus limited Himself to become a man but never God.
Who is inventing theology here? According to what you are claiming it should have read "now you know" instead of "now I know." Now I am no English professor or major but when someone says "now I know", that means it was not known beforehand. Oh let me guess its a figure of speech. You have this preconceived notion about this and apparently you disagree with the bible and also what Dake taught about this simple truth.
Why you gots to make errythang so complicated boo, yes I called you boo, cause you my boo

Again study this in a DARB and GPFM . Do you have either brother? If you do, read and study it again and you will see that your understanding is off.
