Dake Bible Discussion Board ⇒ First John 3:9

[branham1965]

I am very familiar with all of your positions Phil.

BUT even the Oneness Pentecostals do not agree with some of the more EXTREME points you espouse

[Hill Top]

I am very familiar with all of your positions Phil.

BUT even the Oneness Pentecostals do not agree with some of the more EXTREME points you espouse

Like living completely free from sin?

[branham1965]

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

[Hill Top]

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

Either I am teaching something NOT aimed at holiness, or else our definitions of holiness do not match.
Which is it?

[luchnia]

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

This is most interesting. You state that you believe Dake, but all your post on the sin subject simply do not agree with his view at all. If you believe Dake on this subject you would agree with him, right?

[branham1965]

What you two guys teach on here i totally disagree with.
Others disagreed with you guys too.

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

Either I am teaching something NOT aimed at holiness, or else our definitions of holiness do not match.
Which is it?

[bibleman]

What you two guys teach on here i totally disagree with.
Others disagreed with you guys too.

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

Either I am teaching something NOT aimed at holiness, or else our definitions of holiness do not match.
Which is it?

You know this is a discussion board.

Why don't you give biblical reasons with chapter and verse on why you disagree.

Maybe you can change their minds!

[branham1965]

Reverend Dake "the Walking Bible" himself could not change some people's beliefs.

Its like the flat earth thing. I think its a dead horse.

What you two guys teach on here i totally disagree with.
Others disagreed with you guys too.

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

Either I am teaching something NOT aimed at holiness, or else our definitions of holiness do not match.
Which is it?

You know this is a discussion board.

Why don't you give biblical reasons with chapter and verse on why you disagree.

Maybe you can change their minds!

[luchnia]

What you two guys teach on here i totally disagree with.
Others disagreed with you guys too.

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

Either I am teaching something NOT aimed at holiness, or else our definitions of holiness do not match.
Which is it?

Again interesting. I posted information straight from Dake's work, Bible Truths Unmasked and I am posting the very same thing which is exactly what Dake taught - one and the same.Yet, you state he did not teach the same?

Maybe we should take BTU and break it down and all the references Dake used to prove his point about how the saint does not live in sin and see if there is any point I disagree with Dake on. I have studied his material on this subject extensively and find that I agree with him on this issue. I also believe that Dake's view on this is the same concepts as the Word teaches us.

[branham1965]

Ok luchnia.


DO YOU BELIEVE AS HILLTOP DOES ON SIN??That a Christian cannot sin or fall away????

If you DO then YOU DON'T believe as Reverend Dake did!!!!
People can fail and backslide.

Listen to Reverend Dake's messages on youtube.He is so very good.
Notice the divine authority he has to teach and minister the Word.

What you two guys teach on here i totally disagree with.
Others disagreed with you guys too.

Reverend Dake taught holiness.He was strong on it and i believe him.

But he did not teach what you are teaching.Not at all.

Either I am teaching something NOT aimed at holiness, or else our definitions of holiness do not match.
Which is it?

Again interesting. I posted information straight from Dake's work, Bible Truths Unmasked and I am posting the very same thing which is exactly what Dake taught - one and the same.Yet, you state he did not teach the same?

Maybe we should take BTU and break it down and all the references Dake used to prove his point about how the saint does not live in sin and see if there is any point I disagree with Dake on. I have studied his material on this subject extensively and find that I agree with him on this issue. I also believe that Dake's view on this is the same concepts as the Word teaches us.