Dake Bible Discussion Board ⇒ God's Judgement's on Nations and Individual's

[branham1965]

i am studying on this.

Professor Homer Hailey was a revered teacher.


get a copy of his study One Stone Biblical Resources@ Amazon.

God's Judgement and Punishment's Individual's and Nation's

this was his addendum to his study on Daniel.

[branham1965]

He was one of the greatest campbellite scholars of all time...............

[branham1965]

it never ceases to baffle me how that great scholars like Reverend Dake used every Bible resource under the sun.and boy o boy its just dandy.
Many others did as well.Dad Hagin and others.

yet let someone recommend anything on here its ignored as the misguided rantings of a

+pieface

sighs.

[bibleman]

it never ceases to baffle me how that great scholars like Reverend Dake used every Bible resource under the sun.and boy o boy its just dandy.
Many others did as well.Dad Hagin and others.

yet let someone recommend anything on here its ignored as the misguided rantings of a

+pieface

sighs.

Well Billy,

Don't you think the fact that he taught baptismal regeneration would exclude him from being called a Biblical scholar?

[branham1965]

NO.

I REMEMBER YOU SUPPORTING BARCLAY OR SOME OTHER COMMENTATOR BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE DENIED THE MIRACLES OF THE LOAVES AND THE FISHES TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ..........HE WAS STILL JUST DANDY.


DO YOU USE BARNE'S NOTES??? HOW ABOUT OTHER COMMENTARIES????

HOW ABOUT ALL THOSE MATERIALS THAT YOU LISTED IN YOUR REVEREND DAKE BIBLIOGRAPHY???!!!! YOU EVER USE THEM????


IS MR.BULLINGER CONSIDERED NOT A SCHOLAR BECAUSE HE TEACHES RANK HERESY?????

BULLINGER IS HYPER DISPENSATIONAL EXTREMIST AND THAT IS FALSE DOCTRINE.HE TEACHES NO BAPTISM FOR BELIEVERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and that is a contradiction of Jesus Christ Himself in the Great Commission.....thats enough of that.




i recall when a few of those folks-church of Christ ministers challenged people to a public debate right on here.

they were ready and rearing to go.and no one took them up on the challenge.
people here were wise not to have.

its not like playing around with me.

anyone here could not stand a chance in hades against their best debaters.

i read and have heard them debate all kinds.it is quite sobering.

they ARE NOT playing around.

it never ceases to baffle me how that great scholars like Reverend Dake used every Bible resource under the sun.and boy o boy its just dandy.
Many others did as well.Dad Hagin and others.

yet let someone recommend anything on here its ignored as the misguided rantings of a

+pieface

sighs.

Well Billy,

Don't you think the fact that he taught baptismal regeneration would exclude him from being called a Biblical scholar?

[bibleman]

NO.

I REMEMBER YOU SUPPORTING BARCLAY OR SOME OTHER COMMENTATOR BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE DENIED THE MIRACLES OF THE LOAVES AND THE FISHES TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ..........HE WAS STILL JUST DANDY.


DO YOU USE BARNE'S NOTES??? HOW ABOUT OTHER COMMENTARIES????

HOW ABOUT ALL THOSE MATERIALS THAT YOU LISTED IN YOUR REVEREND DAKE BIBLIOGRAPHY???!!!! YOU EVER USE THEM????


IS MR.BULLINGER CONSIDERED NOT A SCHOLAR BECAUSE HE TEACHES RANK HERESY?????

BULLINGER IS HYPER DISPENSATIONAL EXTREMIST AND THAT IS FALSE DOCTRINE.HE TEACHES NO BAPTISM FOR BELIEVERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and that is a contradiction of Jesus Christ Himself in the Great Commission.....thats enough of that.




i recall when a few of those folks-church of Christ ministers challenged people to a public debate right on here.

they were ready and rearing to go.and no one took them up on the challenge.
people here were wise not to have.

its not like playing around with me.

anyone here could not stand a chance in hades against their best debaters.

i read and have heard them debate all kinds.it is quite sobering.

they ARE NOT playing around.

it never ceases to baffle me how that great scholars like Reverend Dake used every Bible resource under the sun.and boy o boy its just dandy.
Many others did as well.Dad Hagin and others.

yet let someone recommend anything on here its ignored as the misguided rantings of a

+pieface

sighs.

Well Billy,

Don't you think the fact that he taught baptismal regeneration would exclude him from being called a Biblical scholar?

How can you call someone a Biblical scholar when they deny the power of faith in Christ alone for their salvation?

[branham1965]

EVERYTHING I SAID WAS TRUE.

AS USUAL YOU IGNORE MY PROPOSITIONS AND GO THERE.

YOU DO NOT EVEN BEGIN TO BELIEVE IN SALVATION BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH ALONE.NOT EVEN CLOSE.

YOU AND REVEREND DAKE AND ALL PENTECOSTALS BELIEVE IN SALVATION BY FAITH +++++WORKS AND A SINLESSLY PERFECT LIFE.

AND YOU GET ON PROFESSOR HAILEY.

NO.

I REMEMBER YOU SUPPORTING BARCLAY OR SOME OTHER COMMENTATOR BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE DENIED THE MIRACLES OF THE LOAVES AND THE FISHES TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ..........HE WAS STILL JUST DANDY.


DO YOU USE BARNE'S NOTES??? HOW ABOUT OTHER COMMENTARIES????

HOW ABOUT ALL THOSE MATERIALS THAT YOU LISTED IN YOUR REVEREND DAKE BIBLIOGRAPHY???!!!! YOU EVER USE THEM????


IS MR.BULLINGER CONSIDERED NOT A SCHOLAR BECAUSE HE TEACHES RANK HERESY?????

BULLINGER IS HYPER DISPENSATIONAL EXTREMIST AND THAT IS FALSE DOCTRINE.HE TEACHES NO BAPTISM FOR BELIEVERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and that is a contradiction of Jesus Christ Himself in the Great Commission.....thats enough of that.




i recall when a few of those folks-church of Christ ministers challenged people to a public debate right on here.

they were ready and rearing to go.and no one took them up on the challenge.
people here were wise not to have.

its not like playing around with me.

anyone here could not stand a chance in hades against their best debaters.

i read and have heard them debate all kinds.it is quite sobering.

they ARE NOT playing around.

it never ceases to baffle me how that great scholars like Reverend Dake used every Bible resource under the sun.and boy o boy its just dandy.
Many others did as well.Dad Hagin and others.

yet let someone recommend anything on here its ignored as the misguided rantings of a

+pieface

sighs.

Well Billy,

Don't you think the fact that he taught baptismal regeneration would exclude him from being called a Biblical scholar?

How can you call someone a Biblical scholar when they deny the power of faith in Christ alone for their salvation?

[bibleman]

EVERYTHING I SAID WAS TRUE.
AS USUAL YOU IGNORE MY PROPOSITIONS AND GO THERE.
YOU DO NOT EVEN BEGIN TO BELIEVE IN SALVATION BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH ALONE.NOT EVEN CLOSE.
YOU AND REVEREND DAKE AND ALL PENTECOSTALS BELIEVE IN SALVATION BY FAITH +++++WORKS AND A SINLESSLY PERFECT LIFE.
AND YOU GET ON PROFESSOR HAILEY.

NO.
I REMEMBER YOU SUPPORTING BARCLAY OR SOME OTHER COMMENTATOR BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE DENIED THE MIRACLES OF THE LOAVES AND THE FISHES TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ..........HE WAS STILL JUST DANDY.

DO YOU USE BARNE'S NOTES??? HOW ABOUT OTHER COMMENTARIES????
HOW ABOUT ALL THOSE MATERIALS THAT YOU LISTED IN YOUR REVEREND DAKE BIBLIOGRAPHY???!!!! YOU EVER USE THEM????
IS MR.BULLINGER CONSIDERED NOT A SCHOLAR BECAUSE HE TEACHES RANK HERESY?????

BULLINGER IS HYPER DISPENSATIONAL EXTREMIST AND THAT IS FALSE DOCTRINE.HE TEACHES NO BAPTISM FOR BELIEVERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and that is a contradiction of Jesus Christ Himself in the Great Commission.....thats enough of that.
i recall when a few of those folks-church of Christ ministers challenged people to a public debate right on here.

they were ready and rearing to go.and no one took them up on the challenge.
people here were wise not to have.

its not like playing around with me.

anyone here could not stand a chance in hades against their best debaters.

i read and have heard them debate all kinds.it is quite sobering.

they ARE NOT playing around.

it never ceases to baffle me how that great scholars like Reverend Dake used every Bible resource under the sun.and boy o boy its just dandy.
Many others did as well.Dad Hagin and others.

yet let someone recommend anything on here its ignored as the misguided rantings of a

+pieface

sighs.

Well Billy,

Don't you think the fact that he taught baptismal regeneration would exclude him from being called a Biblical scholar?

How can you call someone a Biblical scholar when they deny the power of faith in Christ alone for their salvation?

No problem Billy,

I guess we will just have to disagree on this one.

[branham1965]

I was laying down upstairs 5:09am and thought i should post regarding this.

then i saw you posted Pastor.i think the book is interesting.but i dont know why i put all this stuff on here.sighs...i do apologize to you Pastor Bible.










No problem Billy,

I guess we will just have to disagree on this one.[/quote]