No Grandfather,Grandfather wrote:I never said my position was IDENTICAL did I? In the context of the discussion I said that my view (on God's being omnicient in Gen 22:12) was ESSENTIALLY the same, not IDENTIALLYbibleman wrote: Hi Grandfather,
Here is your quote: "I find it very interesting you would make such a remark, since I have shown that my position on God's omniscient is essentially identical to Dake,..."
If you will read the Dake material I posted you will see that you are NOT identical in your view toward Dake.
In Dake's notes to Gen 22:12
Dake writes: God limits His own attributes to conform to His plan for free moral agents.
I agree, though I may disagree as to the HOW those attributes are limited in order for God to conform His plan
Dake writes: This makes Him no less omniscient, but enables Him to respect the will of man.
I have said all along God remains omniscient and respects the (free) will of men
Dake writes: Thus, God does not plan man's choices or acts,
I have said all along man have a free choice, that in spite of God being omniscient God does not dictate, demand or force our actions upon us.
Dake writes:but (God) holds him (man) responsible for them.
Again I've said man is free to choose, but God holds them accountable/responsible for their choice.
On the 3 of the 4 points above I am in full agreement
On the 1st of the 4 I agree in principle, but disagree with the "how"
Please explain to me, why agreement on 3 1/2 points is not ESSENTIALLY the same?
Also explain why the disagreement on the "how" is of primary importance to the point that is supercedes the agreement with the other 3 points.
You said: "essentially identical"
However you and I both know that you don't agree with Dake on this issue.